September 10, 2004
Time Inc. has dropped a bomb on the Guild, and on
all employees at the company. At a meeting with the Guild on September 1, the
company introduced a proposal that would radically increase health-care costs,
especially for lower-wage workers.
The proposals include:
·
A 100% increase in the employee’s contribution to the
health-insurance premium, from 0.5% of salary to 1% of salary (with an as yet
unknown cap on employee contributions, more on that below).
· A number of significant changes in the United Healthcare point of service plan, including, according to the company’s initial proposal:
--All non-office visits
(hospital, X-Ray, lab, etc.) would be covered at 90% instead of the current
100%.
--Out-of network reimbursement in the UHC would fall from 70% to 60%;
--Co-pays for specialist visits in the UHC plan would rise from $15 to $20.
·
Drug co-pays would skyrocket, increasing as much as 533%.
Instead of the current standard co-pays, the structure would move from a
“flat” dollar structure to 20% of the cost of the drug, with generic,
brand-name and mail-order drugs all having a maximum co-pay of $40. The
current $7.50 generic would go to a minimum of $10 and a maximum of $40;
brand-names would have a $20 minimum and a $40 maximum. Mail-order (90-day
supply) co-pays would be $20 for generic and $40 for brand name.
Among the oddities of the proposal is a shifting of the cost burden from the wealthier to the less
well-off. At the meeting the Guild pointed out that this would also represent collective cost-shifting
onto
Guild-covered employees and away from managers. Here’s why:
· Individual health premiums would double for all lower-wage workers, from 0.5% to 1%, up to a maximum contribution (and wage level) that HR couldn’t specify. What their proposal’s chart did specify was that a $100,000-salaried employee with single coverage would have a cap on their annual premiums of $784.94, a smaller percentage increase than for lower-paid employees.
·
Employee + 1 dependent coverage would also double for all
lower-wage workers, from 1% to 2%, with a similarly unknown cap for higher-wage
workers and a not-quite-2% rate for $100,000 earners.
·
Family (employee + 2 or more dependents) coverage would double for
all lower-wage workers, from 1.25% to 2.5%, but also would double for $100,000
earners, and their contributions
would be the full $2,500. The Guild does not know at what point the Family
earnings cap would kick in.
HR did point to the increased Family premiums when the
Guild noted that Time Inc. was sparing higher-paid workers the increases that
were falling on lower-wage workers.
Of course, the Guild will be opposing all of these
increases in upcoming talks. The goal of the company is to shift costs onto
employees, and the Guild will resist this with all its might.
Be aware, however, that language in our contract does not
require the company to negotiate benefit changes with the Guild, but rather
specifies only that the company must, “if requested, consult with the Guild
before making such amendments or changes.”
The Guild Grievance Committee has started the consultation
process with a detailed information request to answer the many questions we
have.
Health costs are going up; the struggle is over who is
going to pay for them. At the contract-extension talks last year, the company
made a big point that it was swallowing the health-care increases and not
passing them on to the employees. That was a valid point to make, and the Guild
was glad that its employees wouldn’t have health-care increases to rob them of
their modest wage increase of 2%.
Can the company reassure us that the non-existent merit
raises of 2004 will become real in 2005? Otherwise most of us will receive a
reduction in our guaranteed wage increase for 2005 plus increased co-pays and
medical fees.
Discussions on the health cuts will continue, and New York
Guild President Barry Lipton has told the Guild unit leaders at Time Inc. that
he will be joining them.
The Guild will keep you posted on further talks and developments.
# # # # #