|
April 24, 2001 Weekly
Paydays Saved
Pay
Freezes Melted TENTATIVE
AGREEMENT REACHED 16.4% In Pay Hikes Over 51 Months Advances in Job Security Other improvements
The Guild and Standard & Poor’s reached a tentative agreement late
Friday afternoon on a new 51-month contract that does not include wage freezes,
twice-a-month paydays, or other management-proposed retrogressions.
The agreement calls for a 4.25% wage increase, retroactive to January 1,
2001, and running through March 31, 2002. On April 1, 2002, a 4% wage hike will
go into effect and then there will be yearly boosts, 3.75% on April 1, 2003,
and 3.5% on April 1, 2004.
The increases compounded are 16.4% over 51 months and will be applied to
all salaries, grand-fathered steps, and minimums.
The agreement was reached Friday by a bargaining sub-committee made up
of New York Newspaper Guild President Barry Lipton, Local Representative Bob
Townsend and Standard & Poor’s Guild Unit Chairperson Ed Fannon.
The bargaining sub-committee constantly reported back to and consulted
with the full committee, which also included Marilyn Bissell of Cash Systems,
Peter Burke of Ratings Information Services, Brian McGuire of Facilities and
Services Management, John Matis of Data Operations, Dorothy Madison of
Subscriber Services – Circulation Fulfillment and Caheim Murray of Mail
Services, which unanimously recommended acceptance of the tentative agreement.
Leo Larkin of the Analytical Department was unable to attend Friday. Bye, Bye to
Freezes and Twice-a-Month Paychecks
In the final round of bargaining, management dropped its menacing
proposal that any wage increases be given to people at the top of their
classifications only in a “lump” payment at the beginning of the contract
year and that the salaries, themselves, be frozen.
It also dropped its proposal that employees at the “hiring-in” and
first-year experience levels also receive the increases in the form of bonuses
instead of salary increases. The
tentative agreement contains no freezing of salaries or experience levels
whatsoever.
And, despite the fact that the company’s lead negotiator, Stephen J.
Macri, a lawyer with the firm of Putney, Twombly, Hall & Hirson, recently
vowed, “Bi-monthly payroll is a necessary element of any wage settlement for
this contract,” the Guild pushed the twice-a-month paydays proposal from the
table late in the final days of negotiations. Meetings Set to
Vote on Contract
A meeting has been set for Thursday, May 10, at 11 a.m. to vote on the
contract in the 13th floor auditorium at 55 Water Street.
Another meeting will be held at 3 p.m. for the people on President
Street in Brooklyn. Guild’s
Proposed Vacation System Adopted If the
proposed contract is passed, we will go to an annual vacation schedule. For
employees hired before January 1, 2001, the transition will take place over 19
months. On June 1, 2001, employees
will be credited with their full entitlement. And on January 1, 2002, employees
will receive an additional 7/12s of earned entitlement, which will be rounded
upward to the next whole number. These
employees will continue to accrue vacation as they have in the past.
Gone is the company’s plan for “instant accrual” that would have
cheated current employees out of accrual money when they leave S&P. Employees
hired after January 1, 2001, will utilize a different vacation earnings system.
Those hired between January 1, and June 30, of each year will receive
one week’s vacation. Those hired
after June 30, must wait until the next calendar year before they’re eligible
for vacation. Then, each January
1, they will instantly accrue their full vacation entitlement.
In agreeing to this, the company agreed to a Guild-proposed system that
preserves full vacation entitlement for everyone. The company
also agreed that employees will be able to “cash out” unused vacation under
certain circumstances, including those times when you’re unable to take
vacation due to the needs of the Publisher, when you’re unable to take time
due to a disability or if there is an economic hardship. Company negotiators
agreed that the economic hardship may be described to a member of the Human
Resources Department on a confidential basis. Other Changes * Under the
tentative agreement, Guild-covered employees who are enrolled in the S&P
Indemnity Health Insurance Plan would switch over to the McGraw-Hill Indemnity
Plan in January if they wish to stay in an indemnity plan.
Rates for the McGraw-Hill Plan will be frozen at the same exact level
they are currently paying under the S&P Indemnity Plan for the entire
length of the contract for both employees and retirees.
The provisions of the McGraw-Hill are basically comparable to the
S&P plan. * The 401(k)
enhancements that were originally offered to the Guild, provided we would agree
to twice-a-month paydays, will now become part of the contract.
We originally rejected the company’s power play, claiming the language
that already existed in the contract mandated the Publisher provide us with the
enhancements if they were available. We filed for an arbitration based on that
premise. In the final round of
bargaining, Lipton, Townsend and Fannon shook the enhancements free from
twice-a-month paydays and the new improved 401(k) plan will got into effect
next January. The Guild will
withdraw its arbitration demand. Beginning the
first of the year, there will be no year’s wait before an employee can
participate in the 401(k), employees will immediately become fully vested,
highly compensated employees will be able to make a 15% contribution up to the
maximum of $10,500 and employees who are not highly compensated may make a 15%
pre-tax contribution as opposed to the 10% pre-tax and 5% post-tax contribution
that they’re now allowed. During
negotiations, the company agreed Guild-covered employees are eligible for
participation in the Spot Bonus Plan, the Management Discretionary Rewards and
Recognition Program and the Service Awards Program, and these programs will now
be incorporated into the contract. * The federal
government has eased up on flexible spending regulations that the company has
now agreed to make available to Guild-covered employees.
Up until now, employees could set aside up $5,000 for health care and
dependent care. Going forward, $5,000 may be set aside separately for both
health care and dependent care, for a total of $10,000. Improvements in
Merit System The
Negotiating Committee was unable to kill the “merit” system of increases
that replaced the “step” system in the last contract for people who have
not reached the top rate in their classifications. We were, however, able to
negotiate meaningful improvements to the system. As you know,
in addition to the annual pay raise, people below the maximum in their
classifications are entitled to 2%, 3% or 4% pay hikes depending upon their
performance reviews. Now, there will be another category. If, in the eyes of
management, an employee’s performance is extraordinary, management would be required
to give a raise in excess of the 4%. Any employee
who isn’t eligible for a merit increase – because of when he or she started
– in the first 12 months of employment, will have the hike pro-rated when he
or she does receive it. For
instance, if you start in October of a given year and you go 15 months before
any merit increase is applied, 15/12s of the increase will be applied to your
salary. For example, using this
illustration, what would have been a 3% increase under the old system, will
increase to 3.75%. Also, if you
receive any merit increase, the increase will now become a permanent part of
your salary, and all future increases will be figured on top of it. All employees
grand-fathered in the old step-up system under the old contract will continue
to be grand-fathered in the new contract. Job Security The tentative
agreement includes advances in the area of job security. Under the
current contract, S&P has an obligation to recall laid-off employees only
to positions they formerly held in their job security group. In the future, the
company will be mandated to recall layoff victims not only to those positions
but also to openings in lower-rated job classifications in their security
group. That obligation would not
be in effect, however, if “such employee is not qualified, in the opinion of
the Publisher, to perform the work of the lower rated job classification.”
If the Guild does not agreed with that opinion, however, we can grieve
and arbitrate the decision. Currently, an
employee who is job eliminated may “bump” only into a position he or she
previously held. Under the
tentative agreement, he or she could now displace another employee in an
equally or lower rated job classification within the affected security group if
the employee to be displaced has not completed his or her probationary period.
Again, the employee would have to be qualified, in the opinion of the
Publisher, to perform the duties in the lower rated classification, but, again,
the Guild could challenge the finding in front of an arbitrator. The job
security groups, from which employees are laid off and to which they are
recalled to work, were reduced from four to three, a big improvement.
Under the agreement, Information Services and Finance and Planning will
be combined into one security group, giving employees there less chance of
being laid off and more chance of being recalled.
The other two security groups are Credit Market Services and Corporate
Facilities. In addition
Guild-covered employees at the company’s President Street facility will have
their guaranteed job security, afforded to them by the settlement of an
arbitration the Guild filed concerning the sub-contracting of some of their
work, extended through May 31, 2002. * The
tentative agreement provides for a new $5,000 reimbursement toward the expenses
of adopting a child, five days off for the adoption of a minor child (the
contract hasn’t specified the number of days off for adoption, but there has
been a practice at S&P of 10 days), and five days paternity leave upon the
birth of a child (paternity leave is currently three days). * Currently,
there is no bereavement (death-in-family) leave in the contract.
By practice, however, S&P has granted Guild-covered employees up to
five days off when relatives closest to them pass away and one day for other
relatives Under the tentative
agreement, bereavement leave is now guaranteed by the contract and three days
will be given for all relatives. At the same
time, however, two new paid urgent personal days will be put into the contract,
and they may be added to the three days of bereavement by the employee.
They will replace two sickness-in-family days, which were a practice for
Guild-covered employees at S&P, but were not in the contract. * A side
agreement was reached allowing Guild-covered employees to participate in the
company’s health club subsidy program. That
was put into effect in advance and 117 Guild members took advantage of the $600
reimbursement for membership at the New York Health and Racquet Club, 63 at the
New York Sports Club and five at the Equinox Fitness Club. * You’ll
recall, the health club subsidy was originally offered to non-Guild employees
while the union employees were shut out. This
scenario can’t happen again if McGraw-Hill adopts TransitChek for its
employees. We’ve got a “me-too” clause in the tentative agreement that
says it will be automatically extended to Guild-covered employees. * The Guild
made a bid for union-covered analysts to participate in the same incentive
program that is offered to analysts who are in management. The company agreed that proposal will be further considered
by a new joint Guild-Management Compensation Committee after the contract is
signed. The same joint committee will also consider a Guild proposal to create
new Senior Copy Editor and Associate Editor positions in Credit Information
Services.
The company also agreed to make its health care expert available
to meet with a Guild Committee to consider the possibility of making a
Point of Service Plan available to retirees. Thank You Our thanks to
all of the Guild members at S&P whose unwavering support throughout these
difficult negotiations helped make this superior settlement possible. # # # # # # #
|