April 3, 2001

 An Analysis: 

CRIMES  AGAINST  THE  GUILD ESCALATE  TO  GRAND  LARCENY

________________________

 BULLETIN

There will be a membership meeting to discuss the status of negotiations this Friday, April 6, in the auditorium at 55 Water Street at 11 a.m. A meeting will be held at the President Street location at 3 in the afternoon.

 _______________________

             In the early rounds of bargaining, management negotiators attempted to subtly pick our pockets with a smile.  Nothing blatant, like an assault to gut our contract. Just a little theft. 

            They asked us to go along with a calendar year vacation schedule as opposed to our current June-to-May formula. Stephen J. Macri, Standard & Poor’s lead negotiator, told us we wouldn’t have to wait to accrue vacation time, we’d get “instant accrual” at the beginning of each vacation year.  He smiled and told us the “instant accrual” was against his advice, but Vice President of Human Resources Bob Temme insisted on making the offer.

            Of course, the flip side of “instant accrual” means you’re not garnering days this year for next year’s vacation.  So, when you leave the company, you don’t get paid for the time you’ve accrued for the future.  Which is a significant savings to the company.  Watch your pockets!

            Then there was the proposal to get paid twice a month instead of weekly. We’d get paid on the 15th and the last day of every month.  The company would take our weekly hours, multiply by 52 and then divide by 24 to determine the figure for the twice-a-month paydays.

            But, as Stock Reports Associate Editor Paul Willig pointed out, for accounting purposes, there are actually 52.178571 weeks in a year, so we would be taking it on the chin a little bit again.  Watch your pockets!

            But now management’s crimes against the Guild have escalated from petty theft to grand larceny.  Last week, when the talks turned to economics in the 13th bargaining session, Standard & Poor’s had the unmitigated gall to propose freezes in both the hiring-in salaries and the maximums (top minimums).

            Sure, they’d give the people at the top of their classifications a bonus, but not a raise. When a percentage increase is agreed to, they’ll pay it out at the start of the contract year. But your weekly salary will remain the same! It won’t help your pension! It won’t raise the amount you’re allowed to contribute to your 401(k)!

            Of course, all of this comes at a time when McGraw-Hill’s revenue rose 7.2% (in 2000) to an all-time high of $4.3 billion. Net income rose 10.9% to $471.9 million. Earnings per share increased 12.6% to $2.41 per share.

            Chairman, President and CEO Terry McGraw, himself, participates in a bonus plan. He got a $1.4 million bonus in 2000.  

            But, then again, McGraw drew a salary of $900,000 in 2000. Maybe if the bonuses S&P were going to be offering us were more than our annual salary, then we could agree to a wage freeze.

            Or maybe if our yearly salaries were in the ballpark of $900,000, we could afford to accept a bonus system.  But, wait a minute, McGraw’s $900,000 salary, even with the bonus, wasn’t frozen from the year before.  No, he only made $825,000 in 1999.  From we’re sitting, that looks like about a 9.2% increase in 2000.  

            But, not to worry, Terry’s not forgetting who’s responsible for McGraw-Hill’s “eighth consecutive year of record performance.”  In the Annual Report, Terry gives a verbal Tip of the ol’ Hatlo hat to “the 17,000 men and women of the McGraw-Hill Companies whose dedication drives our performance, and whose creativity keep uncovering new ways to help our customers reach their potential.  I am pleased that we have been able to translate their efforts into rewards that benefit our customers and shareholders.  Thanks to them, like never before in our 113-year history, The McGraw-Hill Companies is ready for tomorrow.”

            Oh, by the way, the calendar year vacation schedule and the twice-a-month paydays haven’t gone away. Macri, a lawyer with the firm of Putney, Twombly, Hall & Hirson, has indicated management will continue to allow employees the ability to accrue vacations to eliminate that stumbling block.  Current employees, anyhow. New ones, he insisted, will be blessed with instant accrual.  We haven’t agreed.

            And, as far as twice-a-month paydays are concerned, Macri stressed:  “Bi-monthly payroll is a necessary element of any wage settlement for this contract.”  It’s expected management will use a formula to make up for the time we were going to get scammed.  But we haven’t agreed to that either.

            We’ve got a lot to talk about on Friday.

“UNITED  WE  BARGAIN . . . DIVIDED  WE  BEG”

 # # # # # # #