July 8, 2004

OUR RESPONSE TO HOWELL RAINES AND THE ATLANTIC MONTHLY.......

            The current edition of The Atlantic Monthly contains a Letter To The Editor from New York Guild President Barry Lipton and New York Times Guild Unit Chairperson Lena Williams, which responds to the cover story in the May edition by former New York Times Executive Editor Howell Raines, in which he attempts to rationalize his dismissal from the paper in the wake of the Jayson Blair affair.  Unfortunately, the editors of The Atlantic Monthly heavily edited the letter, particularly those portions critical of their handling of the Raines piece.  We reprint the letter as originally submitted.  The portions edited out by The Atlantic Monthly are set in italics.

(Re: “My Times” by Howell Raines, May 2004) 

After reading Howell Raines’s 21,000 word cover story about his final days at The New York Times, our initial response was not to dignify it with a response.  However, as a union that represents journalists, we felt morally compelled and ethically obligated not to allow Mr. Raines’s indictment of The Times and the Guild to stand as fact.

            The Atlantic Monthly permitted Mr. Raines to use the magazine as a bully pulpit to launch a personal attack against the Guild, the Times, and the paper’s journalists, yet the magazine’s editors failed to adhere to a basic principle of journalism: fact-checking.  No one at the magazine contacted the Guild to seek a response or to check facts asserted by Mr. Raines.  As a result, the piece is riddled with errors and inconsistencies that could have been addressed and, perhaps, corrected with a simple telephone call.  Mr. Raines places much of the blame for his own personal demise, and what he views as the recent decline of the paper-of-record, on The Newspaper Guild and its 64-year labor relationship with The Times.

In Mr. Raines’s ill-informed view, the Guild serves as “rush chairman of the culture of complaint” at The Times; instills “dysfunctional traits” in new hires; forces senior editors to “testify” at endless grievance hearings; and strong-armed the company into accepting “mindless job guarantees.”

His categorical statement that “at The New York Times we never fired anyone,” is absurd especially since Mr. Raines goes on to say that he was fired.  Even the most junior reporter or copy editor would have questioned Mr. Raines’s assertion that in its 153-year-history, The New York Times has never fired anyone.

Employees can, and have been, fired by The Times but not without the due process provided under the contract between the Guild and The Times.  In fact, the Guild-Times collective bargaining agreement includes a “progressive discipline” procedure under which employees can face disciplinary action, “up to and including dismissal.”  It also provides for binding arbitration should we dispute the dismissal.

The “grievance hearings” Mr. Raines refers to are actually sometimes “disciplinary hearings,” meetings between Times management and the Guild to deal with work-related employee issues, ranging from lateness to job performance.  Such meetings are called by The Times Labor Relations department, not by the Guild.  Employees are entitled to Guild representation at these meetings.  The meetings seldom go on for hours and are held, when possible, at a time and place convenient for the parties involved.  Seldom are top editors involved in such meetings.

Mr. Raines incorrectly invented a hybrid of meetings routinely held between the Guild and the Times: the disciplinary meeting and the grievance meeting.  Grievance meetings are monthly meetings, usually an hour or two in length, held between the Guild and representatives from the company’s labor relations department to discuss possible violations of the Guild contract and to resolve them, if possible, in a timely fashion in order to avert arbitration. Editors do not attend grievance meetings.

One of the most egregious claims made by Mr. Raines is that staff members at The Times get “tenure for life” after a probationary period of 14 weeks.  Based on job titles, the probationary periods for new employees are 12, 15 and 26 weeks.  Trial periods for reporters, photographers and copyeditors are 26 weeks.  There are no 14-week trial periods.  What Mr. Raines failed to say, perhaps because he was ignorant of the fact or simply cared to ignore it, is that Times management has the right to fire an employee at any time during their probationary period, without explanation.  The Guild cannot challenge such dismissals unless they are discriminatory.

            Had Mr. Raines taken the time to read the contract, which is available to all employees at the Times and is available to anyone upon request, he would have saved himself, and your magazine, the embarrassment of an error, that left unchecked, became a mistake.

Mr. Raines’s obvious contempt for the union is misplaced.  Mr. Raines need only to look in the mirror to find the true cause of his demise rather than point accusatory fingers in every direction.  Mr. Raines describes The Times as a company in which the union is mommy and the company is daddy.  The relationship between the Guild and The Times dates back to 1940, when the first collective bargaining agreement was signed between the parties.  Since then, there have only been three strikes at the paper, in 1962, 1978 and 1981.  Together, the Guild and The Times have built what even Mr. Raines begrudgingly acknowledges is “the world’s greatest newspaper.”

Although Mr. Raines has a right to his opinion, the Guild and the 1,500 employees we represent at The Times are disappointed that the editors of The Atlantic Monthly did not feel the need to offer their readers a more balanced story.  There are three sides to every story: yours, mine, and the hard, cold truth.  Having read Mr. Raines’s piece we were reminded of a line in Nikki Giovanni’s poem, “Ego Tripping.”  It says: “I’m so perfect, even my errors are correct.”

Barry Lipton, New York Guild President

Lena Williams, Times-Guild Unit Chair

New York. N.Y. April 28, 2004

 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

LENA WILLIAMS NOMINATED FOR THE

GUILD SERVICE AWARD. . . . .

 

            New York Times Guild Unit Chairperson Lena Williams has been nominated for this year's Guild Service Award from the [International] Newspaper Guild (TNG).  The citation, presented at The Guild’s annual convention (Sector Meeting) is given to the rank-and-file member judged to have made outstanding contributions to the union and it’s members at the unit and local levels.  The winner is chosen from members nominated from throughout TNG.  Lena was nominated by N.Y. Guild President Barry Lipton, and her nomination was unanimously endorsed by our Executive Committee. 

# # # # # # #

 07/08/04